The Argument To The Hypotheses In Parmenides

نویسنده

  • James Doull
چکیده

The reader of Parmenides should put himself in the place of the Clazomenian philosophers who have come to Athens to hear the great argument of Socrates with Zeno and Parmenides as recorded in the memory of Antiphon. From it they would learn what Anaxagoras had not made clear, how the nous, alone unmixed, could relate to the atoms in each of which were all difference, the endless process of separating their differences from the original mixture. Of the atoms in this endless process nothing could be said distinctly that would not show itself as other in further division.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Plato’s Parmenides: Interpretations and Solutions to the Third Man

Plato’s Parmenides fulfills a special role in understanding Plato’s theory of Forms. Throughout his dialogues, Plato is pleased to invoke the theory intermittently, often as ancillary support for related pieces of his philosophy. But the theory itself remains concealed, even mysterious, never giving up a broad exposure for the reader’s immediate analysis. Hence, what we know of Plato’s Forms co...

متن کامل

The History of Mathematical Logic

(vastly abbreviated and horribly simpliied) Michaa l Walicki 1997 The term \logic" may be, very roughly and vaguely, associated with something like \correct thinking". Aristotle deened a syllogism as \discourse in which, certain things being stated something other than what is stated follows of necessity from their being so." And, in fact, this intuition not only lies at its origin, ca. 500 BC,...

متن کامل

Cosmological argument in proving the existence of God from Imam Khomeini's (RA) point of view

  This article reviews Cosmological argument in proving the existence of God from the viewpoint of Imam Khomeini (RA). At first, various views to the existence of God are reviewed and then its etymology will be reviewed. Cosmological argument proves God through universal premises about truth and world and and the Movement Argument, Casual Argument and Necessity and Possibility Argument are dif...

متن کامل

Time for a Change: A Polemic against the Presentism–Eternalism Debate

Both Heraclitus and Parmenides, each in his own way, denied the possibility of change. A thing, in going from having P , and thus being a P -thing, to lacking P , apparently becomes what it is not, namely a nonP -thing. Since, according to Parmenides, nothing can become what it is not, no thing can change. Heraclitus seems to have found nothing to complain about in Parmenides’ argument. Yet, he...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008